Throne Room OOC - Archived Parts

I'll wait for Jareth to post before I post again

Post order:

Celdiur - Marcus - Jareth

Hey, look! Pravenstern is angry and has a new signature. Apparently the Griffons had a heated debate in their quarters.

That is referring to what Izzy was supposed to say to the assembly on behalf of Darlion.


She has said something else.

Bad Izzy. Does that mean the griffons have a new dawn-like schism?


EDIT: red dawn. too many factions to memorize.

Saeros wrote:

Hey, look! Pravenstern is angry and has a new signature. Apparently the Griffons had a heated debated in their quarters.

I've had the new piece for few days. Sir Azrael dislikes politics and the reminder of the fact that he has to listen to all that dung doesn't make him happy.

But take it however you want, not my fault if you capitalize on wrong conclusions.

Capitalizing on wrong conclusions is what makes Pendor, well, Pendor!

Is Kamos already back? And the Eventiders should hurry, I'd say. We have a kingdom to drown in quarrels

Technically I never left the room .

I assumed everyone left for the lunch break, since the room was locked up during that time.

Well, guess you overlooked Kamos :p

Typical, trying to starve the Marshal into submission.

Get your alehouse meeting done, guys, the rest of the council is waiting for you.

Mitchell.

WELCOMEWELCOMEWELCOME AND WELCOME BACK

Thanks

I take it that you really are coming back.

Welcome!

I think we should really move on with the council before we loose ourselves in boredom, so we might want to assume that Celdiur and Varys have returned by now...

Iskar wrote:

I assumed everyone left for the lunch break, since the room was locked up during that time.

I just sat there like this:

I picture Iskar in the tavern:

Lol, perfect choice, Tubby

Kamos wrote:

Iskar wrote:

I assumed everyone left for the lunch break, since the room was locked up during that time.

I just sat there like this:

I never imagined Kamos as the musician-type. Next time Izzy sings 'The Kicker of Queens' she will have to ask Kamos to play the appropriate tune.

aaaaa im so scared to comment now in case i have another blinding gap in logic

Apologies for rambling, there are arguments somewhere in that mess.

I find the discussion right now rather invigorating. Let's carry on, lads (and lassies ).

By the way, I have always assumed a feudal system, in which a Noldor duke-equivalent attacking crown lands, means that the crown itself is obligated to defend against him, and then the Noldor would be forced to either denounce Aeldarian, or completely support him. Also, I'm internally debating whether to say it IC, but the way the provinces work in this is basically an idealised version of attempts in the Feudal system, which did not work out in reality.

In a feudal system lords of different kingdoms can have feuds of their own without the crowns intervening. E.g. Enguerrand VII de Coucy was a vassal of the french crown in the 14th century and he had a feud with a lord who was a vassal of the holy roman emperor. Coucy even assembled an army and attacked the other lord, while neither the emperor nor the king did anything to intervene.

Wow, too many words were said while I was away.